Noncriteria antiphospholipid antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic manifestations and/or obstetric complications in patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). aPL are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies, but only lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI) IgG or IgM are included as laboratory classification criteria. Seronegative APS patients are usually defined as patients with the clinical symptoms of APS but who test negative for aPL. The negativity to classic aPL criteria does not exclude the presence of other aPL. Several noncriteria aPL have been identified. Some noncriteria aPL are well studied, such as IgA aCL and aß2GPI, the antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, and the antibodies against the domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I (aDI), both latter groups receiving more attention for their role in thrombotic events and pregnancy complications. Other noncriteria aPL that have been studied are antibodies against annexin V, prothrombin, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, vimentin-cardiolipin complex, anti-protein S/protein C. Measurement of some of these noncriteria aPL (aPS/PT, aDI) is useful in the laboratory work-out of APS in specific situations. We have to differentiate between patients who are positive for noncriteria aPL only, and patients who have both criteria and noncriteria aPL to enable us to study their role in the diagnosis or risk stratification of APS. The research on noncriteria aPL is continually developing as the clinical relevance of these antibodies is not yet fully clarified.

Skin erythematous migrant lesions consistent with histologically confirmed dermal arteriolar thrombosis connected to APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilic disorder related to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (LAC, anticardiolipin, anti Beta2-glycoprotein) known to cause venous and arterial thrombosis and recurrent pregnancy loss. Skin disorder is a frequent finding usually due to vascular thrombosis involving the dermal layer and can be either localized or widespread causing necrosis and ulceration of the skin, without histological evidence of vasculitis. We present a case of a woman with APS with both arterial and venous thrombotic involvement associated with an atypical dermatological manifestation histologically consistent with a pauci-inflammatory intermediate-deep dermal arteriolar platelet-mediated thrombosis that appeared despite anticoagulation with warfarin and responding to the addition of antiplatelet therapy.

Viewpoint: Provoked thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Unprovoked thrombosis (thrombosis occurring without an established environmental factor favouring the episode) is a classic feature of APS. In the general population, provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is clearly defined and has clinical and therapeutic differences compared with unprovoked VTE. Whether provoked VTE in the context of APS may lead to a limited treatment duration is not well established. Therefore, careful clinical and laboratory evaluation is needed to identify patients eligible for a limited duration of anticoagulation treatment after provoked VTE. Given the uncertainties of available data, the risks and benefits of treatment decisions should be clearly explained. Decisions should be shared by both the patient and physician. Cardiovascular risk factors are common in patients with APS with arterial thrombosis. There are insufficient data suggesting that cardiovascular risk factor control would allow the cessation of anticoagulation. In most instances, arterial thrombosis will require prolonged anticoagulants. A careful analysis of clinical characteristics and laboratory evaluation, particularly the aPL antibody profile, is needed to make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

Anticardiolipin Antibody Plays a More Important Role Than Anti-ß2-Glycoprotein I Antibody in Activating Complement in Patients with Lupus Nephritis.

Objective: This research aimed to explore the correlation between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and complement activation in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients diagnosed with LN based on renal biopsy from June 2019 to June 2022. The study assessed levels of IgM, IgA, and IgG subtypes of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2-GPI) antibodies. Pathological and clinical data were collected concurrently with the renal biopsy. Results: The analysis included 76 LN patients, with 44.7% testing positive for aPLs. LN patients with positive aPLs exhibited increased hematuria, higher SLEDAI scores, reduced serum C3 and C4 levels, and more C1q deposits in the glomerulus compared to those with negative aPLs (P<0.05). Correlation analysis demonstrated the inverse relationships between IgG-aCL levels and serum C3 and C4 levels (r=-0.29, P=0.005; r=-0.24, P=0.016, respectively), as well as a positive correlation with C4 deposits in the glomerulus (r=0.20, P=0.041). Conclusion: This investigation suggests that aPLs, particularly IgG-aCLs, may be associated with the severity of LN and could contribute to the activation of classical complement pathways.

Anticardiolipin Antibody Determination to Guide Q Fever Treatment.

Query (Q) fever is a worldwide infectious disease with acute and chronic manifestations caused by Coxiella burnetii. The clinical manifestations are so variable that the disease is often only diagnosed if systematically considered as a differential diagnosis. Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old man who lived in a countryside house, with cattle and sheep in his field, with acute Q fever hepatitis with the typical granulomatous arrangement in the liver biopsy. The diagnosis was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in a serum sample and the presence of phase II antibodies. Anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) determination at diagnosis of acute Q fever and during follow-up was made to persecute early identification and to guide the treatment and prophylaxis of possible complications, such as endocarditis.

Antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome 40th anniversary.

This article is a celebration of the 40th anniversary of APS, a disease that appears to affect one in 2000 people. The quality of life of patients affected has improved significantly as a result of early diagnosis and effective treatment.

IgA is the predominant isotype of anti-ß2 glycoprotein I in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to determine the frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The frequency and titers of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI) were determined in sera of adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, IgM aCL, and aß2GPI were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 62 ± 13.9 years, ranging from 23 to 86 years. Stratification according to severity of infection divided patients in 2 groups: 45 patients with moderate infection and 38 patients with critical or severe infection. Out of the 83 patients suffering from COVID-19, aPL (aCL or aß2GPI) were detected in 24 patients (28.9%). IgG, IgA and IgM aß2GPI were positive in 2.4%, 16.9% and 8.4%, respectively. IgG, IgA and IgM aCL showed positivity in 7.2%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively. The frequency of aPL was 36.8% in patients with critical/severe infection and 22.2% in patients with moderate infection. In critical/severe patients, the frequency of aß2GPI was significantly higher than aCL (34.2% vs 13.2%, P = .03) and aß2GPI-IgA were significantly more frequent than aß2GPI-IgG (21.1% vs 2.6%, P = .028). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, aPL and particularly aß2GPI-IgA were common in patients with COVID-19.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Vascular Thrombosis in Patients with Severe Forms of COVID-19.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) are a laboratory criterion for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are known to cause clinical symptoms such as vascular thrombosis or obstetric complications. It is suggested that aPLA may be associated with thromboembolism in severe COVID-19 cases. Therefore, we aimed to combine clinical data with laboratory findings of aPLA at four time points (admission, worsening, discharge, and 3-month follow-up) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. In 111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, current and past history of thrombosis and pregnancy complications were recorded. Nine types of aPLA were determined at four time points: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti- ß2GPI), and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) of the IgM, IgG, or IgA isotypes. During hospitalization, seven patients died, three of them due to pulmonary artery thromboembolism (none were aPLA positive). Only one of the five who developed pulmonary artery thrombosis was aPLA positive. Out of 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, five had arterial thrombosis and none were aPLA positive at admission and follow-up; four had venous thrombosis, and one was aPLA positive at all time points (newly diagnosed APS). Of these 9/101 patients, 55.6% were transiently aPLA positive at discharge only, compared to 26.1% without a history of thrombosis (p = 0.041). Patients with severe forms of COVID-19 and positive aPLA should receive the same dose and anticoagulant medication regimen as those with negative aPLA because those antibodies are mostly transiently positive and not linked to thrombosis and fatal outcomes.

Hyperoside exerts protective effects against anticardiolipin antibody-induced recurrent pregnancy loss in vivo and in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are at high risk for obstetric complications, including recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, effective treatments for RPL are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reveal the function and underlying mechanism of hyperoside (Hyp) in RPL associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aCLs). METHODS: The pregnant rats (N = 24) were divided randomly into four groups: normal human-IgG (NH-IgG); aCL-pregnancy loss (aCL-PL); aCL-PL + Hyp (40 mg/kg/day); aCL-PL + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, 525 µg/kg/day). HTR-8 cells were treated with 80 µg/mL aCL to establish the cell models of miscarriage. RESULTS: In pregnant rats, aCL-IgG injection raised the abortion rate of embryos, while Hyp treatment inhibited the effects. Additionally, Hyp inhibited the platelet activation and uteroplacental insufficiency caused by aCL. In vivo and in vitro experiments further suggested that Hyp suppressed aCL-induced inflammation and apoptosis by downregulating NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome-related factors and decreasing apoptotic rates. After aCL administration, Hyp therapy downregulated the expression of purinergic ligand-gated ion channel 7 (P2X7), which is reported to induce cytokine release and apoptosis. Furthermore, we found that the treatment of 3'-O-(4-Benzoyl) benzoyl-ATP (BzATP, an agonist of the P2X7 receptor) reversed the inhibitory effects of Hyp on cell function. CONCLUSIONS: Hyp exerts protective effects on aCL-induced pregnancy loss by preventing platelet activation-mediated P2X7/NLRP3 pathway. Therefore, Hyp may provide a feasible pharmaceutical strategy for the treatment of RPL.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in pulmonary embolism treated with direct oral anticoagulants: Prevalence data from unselected consecutive patients.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-choice treatment option for the prevention of the recurrence of venous thrombosis in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE); however, their effect in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is challenged. Therefore, the prevalence of antiphospholipid autoantibodies in patients with PE is noteworthy. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of unselected patients presenting with PE who meet the criteria for APS based on elevated levels of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies. Methods: Consecutive patients with PE, in whom DOACs were primarily initiated, were tested for aCL and aß2GPI. If the levels were elevated, the tests were repeated after 12 weeks for APS diagnosis. Laboratory results and patient characteristics were retrospectively collected from a laboratory information system and electronic patient journal entries over a 2-year period. Results: The prevalence of APS based on consistently elevated levels of aCL or aß2GPI was 3.7% (10 of 267 patients). Three patients were double positive. In 11 out of 21 patients (52%) with initially elevated values, the levels of the antibodies normalized after 12 weeks. The patient characteristics were largely similar in those with APS and those without APS; however, patients with APS tended to be older and more likely to receive antithrombotic treatment at the time of PE. Conclusion: We found a relatively low prevalence of APS based on aCL or aß2GPI. The high rate of normalized levels of the antibodies after 12 weeks reaffirms the need for repeated tests for APS diagnosis. Older patients more frequently met the criteria for APS. Determining the effectiveness of DOACs in non-triple-positive patients with APS following venous thromboembolism is important to further determine the feasibility of unselected tests in patients with PE.

Levels and avidities of antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies in patients with thrombotic events and immunologically-mediated diseases.

AIMS: Antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies (aPE) represent one type of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) directed against the neutral phospholipids - phosphatidylethanolamines. The aim of this study was to evaluate levels and avidities of aPE in several groups of patients and compare them with conventional aPLs. METHODS: aPE were analysed in a cohort consisting of 68 hospitalized patients. The other cohort comprised 22 patients with immunologically-mediated diseases. The control group consisted of 20 healthy persons. ELISA methods were used for determination of aPL. Avidities of aPE were tested by modified ELISA with urea as a chaotropic agent. RESULTS: aPE IgG/IgM were significantly higher in the group of patients with venous thromboembolism than those with non-thrombotic internal disorders (P=0.02 for both Ig classes). aPE IgG/IgM elevated above cut-off values were found in 10.8% of patients with venous thromboembolism and as a single aPL in 6.5%. Levels of aPE IgG higher than our limit (>6 U/mL) were detected in 29% of patients with immunologically-mediated diseases with other positive aPL. Low-, intermediate- and high-avidity aPE IgG were found in patients of both cohorts. The avidities of aPE IgG differed from those of anticardiolipin antibodies IgG. Neither aPE IgG levels nor avidity dynamics significantly changed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: aPE may be related to venous thromboembolism and may be part of the repertoire of aPL in immunologically-mediated diseases. There are patients with thrombosis negative for conventional aPL but positive for aPE. aPE IgG may have different avidities.

COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and the coagulopathy of COVID-19 share many pathophysiologic features, including endotheliopathy, hypercoagulability, and activation of platelets, complement pathways, and neutrophil extracellular traps, all acting in concert via a model of immunothrombosis. Antiphospholipid antibody production in COVID-19 is common, with 50% of COVID-19 patients being positive for lupus anticoagulant in some studies, and with non-Sapporo criteria antiphospholipid antibodies being prevalent as well. The biological significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 is uncertain, as such antibodies are usually transient, and studies examining clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies have yielded conflicting results. In this review, we explore the biology of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 and other infections and discuss mechanisms of thrombogenesis in antiphospholipid syndrome and parallels with COVID-19 coagulopathy. In addition, we review the existing literature on safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and antiphospholipid syndrome.

Autoimmune and immunoserological markers of COVID-19 pneumonia: Can they help in the assessment of disease severity.

Background: Immune dysregulation and associated inefficient anti-viral immunity during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause tissue and organ damage which shares many similarities with pathogenetic processes in systemic autoimmune diseases. In this study, we investigate wide range autoimmune and immunoserological markers in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Study included 51 patients with confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infection and hospitalized due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Wide spectrum autoantibodies associated with different autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases were analyzed and correlated with clinical and laboratory features and pneumonia severity. Results: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity was found in 19.6%, anti-cardiolipin IgG antibodies (aCL IgG) in 15.7%, and anti-cardiolipin IgM antibodies (aCL IgM) in 7.8% of patients. Positive atypical x anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (xANCA) were detected in 10.0% (all negative for Proteinase 3 and Myeloperoxidase) and rheumatoid factor was found in 8.2% of patients. None of tested autoantibodies were associated with disease or pneumonia severity, except for aCL IgG being significantly associated with higher pneumonia severity index (p = 0.036). Patients with reduced total serum IgG were more likely to require non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) (p < 0.0001). Serum concentrations of IgG (p = 0.003) and IgA (p = 0.032) were significantly lower in this group of patients. Higher total serum IgA (p = 0.009) was associated with mortality, with no difference in serum IgG (p = 0.115) or IgM (p = 0.175). Lethal outcome was associated with lower complement C4 (p = 0.013), while there was no difference in complement C3 concentration (p = 0.135). Conclusion: Increased autoimmune responses are present in moderate and severe COVID-19. Severe pneumonia is associated with the presence of aCL IgG, suggesting their role in disease pathogenesis. Evaluation of serum immunoglobulins and complement concentration could help assess the risk of non-invasive mechanical ventilation NIMV and poor outcome.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of a clinical criterion (thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity), combined with persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, laboratory criteria aPL consist of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG/IgM, and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI) IgG/IgM. Diagnosis and risk stratification of APS are complex and efforts to standardize and optimize laboratory tests have been ongoing since the initial description of the syndrome. LAC detection is based on functional coagulation assays, while aCL and aß2GPI are measured with immunological solid-phase assays. LAC assays are especially prone to interference by anticoagulation therapy, but strategies to circumvent this interference are promising. Alternative techniques such as thrombin generation for LAC detection and to estimate LAC pathogenicity have been suggested, but are not applicable yet in routine setting. For aCL and aß2GPI, a lot of different assays and detection techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent and chemiluminescent assays are available. Furthermore, a lack of universal calibrators or standards results in high variability between the different solid-phase assays. Other non-criteria aPL such as anti-domain I ß2 glycoprotein I and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies have been suggested for risk stratification purposes in APS, while their added value to diagnostic criteria seems limited. In this review, we will describe laboratory assays for diagnostic and risk evaluation in APS, integrating applicable guidelines and classification criteria. Current insights and hindrances are addressed with respect to both laboratory and clinical implications.

Determination of diagnostic threshold in harmonization and comparison of clinical utility for five major antiphospholipid antibody assays used in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2 GPI) are essential in diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) according to the international APS guideline. Five commercial assays for aCL and aß2 GPI are available in Japan, but their test results are quite discordant. For harmonization of diagnosing APS, upper reference limit (URL) and diagnostic accuracy of each assay were evaluated and compared by testing common sets of specimens across all assays. METHODS: We evaluated two manual and three automated assays for aCL and aß2 GPI of IgG- and IgM classes. 99%URL (the upper limit of reference interval: as per guideline) together with 97.5%URL were determined by testing sera from 198 to 400 well-defined healthy subjects. Both URLs were compared with the cutoff values, which were determined based on ROC analysis by testing 50 each of plasma specimens from patients with/without APS. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated as area under curve (AUC) of the ROC curve. RESULTS: A variable degree of discrepancy between URLs and the cutoff values was observed, which was partly attributable to between-year assay variability. 97.5%URLs were set lower and closer to the cutoff values than 99%URLs. For all assays, diagnostic accuracies of both aß2 GPI-IgG and aCL-IgG were generally high (AUC: 0.84-0.93); whereas those for IgM-class assays were low (AUC: 0.57-0.67), implicating its utility is limited to rare IgG negative APS cases. CONCLUSION: To ensure harmonized APS diagnosis, the diagnostic thresholds of the five assays were evaluated by common procedures. Contrary to the guideline, 97.5%URL is rather recommended for diagnosing APS, which showed a closer match to the cutoff value.

IgA anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been reported not only in various autoimmune conditions but also in other infections, such as chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of aPL in patients with CHC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six CHC patients and 90 healthy blood donors (HBD) were studied. Fifty-three of the patients were under treatment, and 43 had not yet received any treatment. IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against cardiolipin (aCL) and beta-2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) were detected by ELISA. RESULTS: We found that the frequency of aPL (aCL and/or aß2GPI) was significantly higher in CHC patients than in controls (51% vs 11.1%, p <10-6). The frequencies of aCL and aß2GPI were significantly higher in patients than in HBD (27.1% vs 5.5%, p < 10-3, and 44.8% vs 11.1%, p < 10-6, respectively). The isotype distribution of aCL and aß2GPI demonstrated that aCL-IgG and aß2GPI-IgA were more frequent in patients than in healthy subjects (21.9% vs 2.2%, p < 10-3, and 38.5% vs 7.8%, p < 10-6, respectively). In CHC patients, the frequency of aß2GPI was significantly higher than that of aCL (44.8% vs 27.1%, p = 0.01). aß2GPI-IgA was significantly more frequent than aß2GPI-IgG (38.5% vs 7.3%, p <10-6), aß2GPI-IgM (38.5% vs 9.4%, p <10-3), and aCL-IgG (38.5% vs 21.9%, p = 0.01). No difference in aPL frequency was observed between the treated and untreated patients. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the findings of this study, aPL, particularly aß2GPI-IgA and aCL-IgG, are frequent in CHC patients.

Case report: MELAS and concomitant presumed antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in an adult woman.

Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, stroke-like episodes, and other features (short stature, headaches, seizures, and sensorineural hearing loss) constitute characteristics of MELAS syndrome. MELAS is a rare condition due to mutations in maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA with levels of heteroplasmy possibly related to late adulthood presentation. A previously reported MELAS case coexisted with presumed Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APLAS), but the connection between MELAS and a potential APLAS is unclear. A 29-year-old woman presented with mild right-sided sensorimotor symptoms and mixed aphasia in November 2021. She presented again in May 2022 for unrelenting headaches and was found to have a new right hemisphere syndrome with mild left-sided sensorimotor symptoms, hemineglect, and anosognosia. Characteristic lab and imaging studies were obtained. During the first presentation (October 2021), the discovery of anticardiolipin IgM antibodies (aCL) (and their replication 3 months later) led to a diagnosis of APLAS, and Warfarin was initiated. During the second admission (May 2022), a new stroke-like lesion on the right hemisphere with characteristic features not suggestive of ischemia was detected, which led to a diagnosis of MELAS (m3243A > G mutation). Although MELAS and APLAS could co-exist, alternatively, it is possible that antiphospholipid antibodies might be generated when the strongly anionic Cardiolipin-Hydroperoxide from the inner mitochondrial membrane is exposed to immune component cells upon cell lysis. Thus, the presence of aCL in patients with stroke-like lesions might masquerade as an APLAS, but should probably be questioned if only aCL are repeatedly found and imaging findings are not characteristic for ischemic lesions.

Autoantibodies: are they a clue for liver diseases?

Introduction: Autoantibody testing has contributed to both biological and clinical insights in managing patients with liver disease. These autoantibodies often have clinical value for the diagnosis, disease activity and/or prognosis. Aim of the study: We aimed to investigate the potential application of auto-antibodies in different etiologies of non-autoimmune liver diseases. Material and methods: This study was conducted on 53 infants and children with chronic liver diseases. The patients were subjected to clinical history and examination, laboratory investigations and abdominal ultrasound. Serum of all infants and children was tested for measurement of antiprothrombin antibody and anti-b2-glycoprotein I (ab2GPI) and anticardiolipin (ACL) auto-antibodies using a fully-automated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. Results: The mean age of the infants with cholestatic liver diseases was significantly lower than those with metabolic liver diseases, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and vascular liver diseases (p < 0.05). The gender distribution was proportionate in all groups (p = 0.703). Autoantibodies showed significant variations among different etiologies of chronic liver diseases. he incidence of ab2GPI and ACL was significantly increased in both HCV (94.7% and 78.9%, respectively) and vascular liver diseases patients (90.9% and 72.7%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Antiprothrombin antibodies were found in 81.8% of vascular liver disease patients. Interestingly, all types of autoantibodies were deficient in cholestatic and metabolic liver diseases. Conclusions: Testing for liver-related autoantibodies should be included in the workup of patients with chronic liver diseases. Further studies are needed to explain the cause-effect association of ACL, ab2GPI and antiprothrombin with chronic HCV and vascular liver diseases.

Role of antiphospholipid antibodies in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies on the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI) IgG or IgM are included as laboratory criteria, if persistently present. LAC measurement remains a complicated procedure with many pitfalls and interfered by anticoagulant therapy. Solid-phase assays for aCL and aß2GPI show interassay differences. These methodological issues make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. In the interpretation of aPL results, antibody profiles help in identifying patients at risk. Other aPL, such as antibodies against the domain I of beta2-glycoprotein (aDI) and antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies have been studied in the last years and may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients. Because of the methodological shortcomings of immunological and clotting assays, these non-criteria aPL may be useful in patients with incomplete antibody profiles to confirm or exclude the increased risk profile. This manuscript will focus on the laboratory aspects, the clinical relevance of assays and interpretation of aPL results in the diagnosis of APS.